Current:Home > MyMichigan’s top court gives big victory to people trying to recoup cash from foreclosures -Elevate Money Guide
Michigan’s top court gives big victory to people trying to recoup cash from foreclosures
View
Date:2025-04-14 20:28:50
DETROIT (AP) — The Michigan Supreme Court said Monday that its 2020 decision stopping local governments from keeping cash windfalls from the sale of foreclosed homes can be applied retroactively, meaning that hundreds of millions of dollars could potentially be returned to people who lost properties over unpaid taxes.
Local governments were “essentially stealing from people,” said Christina Martin, an attorney who argued the case for former property owners. “It doesn’t matter if it’s going to be expensive to pay them back. They have to pay them back.”
For years, counties kept profits from the sale of foreclosed homes or land — even if the leftover cash far exceeded the amount of unpaid property taxes.
For example, Uri Rafaeli owed $8.41 in taxes on a rental property in Southfield. The bill grew to $285 with penalties and interest. Oakland County sold the house for $24,500 but kept the balance, which was legal at the time.
The Supreme Court in 2020 said the practice violated the Michigan Constitution. And now the court said the ruling can be applied retroactively to foreclosures that happened before the opinion was released four years ago.
“It’s a no-brainer,” Martin said.
Writing for the court, Justice Brian Zahra said the case “involves governmental violation of the constitutional rights of numerous individuals.”
He said “we are not without sympathy” toward communities that kept the surplus cash because state law had allowed it.
“Nonetheless, while the problem originated with the Legislature,” Zahra wrote, “at the foundation of our government is the precept that no state officer or local government can justify a constitutional violation on the basis of a statutory directive.”
Phil Ellison, another attorney for former property owners, said tens of thousands of people now might qualify for payment.
The Michigan Municipal League, which represents local governments, argued against making the 2020 decision retroactive, saying communities shouldn’t be penalized for following what was allowed under law. Complying with this ruling could cost hundreds of millions of dollars, they warned.
“The result is potential fiscal chaos across the state, as local governments will be forced to either cut services or raise taxes and fees to make up the holes in their budgets,” the group said in a court filing.
___
Follow Ed White on X at https://twitter.com/edwritez
veryGood! (21317)
Related
- 'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
- My Little Pony finally hits the Toy Hall of Fame, alongside Phase 10 and Transformers
- 'Gladiator 2' review: Yes, we are entertained again by outrageous sequel
- As US Catholic bishops meet, Trump looms over their work on abortion and immigration
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- Brian Austin Green Shares Message to Sharna Burgess Amid Ex Megan Fox's Baby News
- My Little Pony finally hits the Toy Hall of Fame, alongside Phase 10 and Transformers
- Brian Austin Green’s Fiancée Sharna Burgess Celebrates Megan Fox’s Pregnancy News
- Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
- Tua Tagovailoa playing with confidence as Miami Dolphins hope MNF win can spark run
Ranking
- McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
- Tuskegee University closes its campus to the public, fires security chief after shooting
- What’s the secret to growing strong, healthy nails?
- School workers accused of giving special needs student with digestive issue hot Takis, other abuse
- Man can't find second winning lottery ticket, sues over $394 million jackpot, lawsuit says
- Too Hot to Handle’s Francesca Farago Gives Birth, Welcomes Twins With Jesse Sullivan
- Messi breaks silence on Inter Miami's playoff exit. What's next for his time in the US?
- Olivia Munn Says She “Barely Knew” John Mulaney When She Got Pregnant With Their Son
Recommendation
Trump invites nearly all federal workers to quit now, get paid through September
Brittany Cartwright Defends Hooking Up With Jax Taylor's Friend Amid Their Divorce
What’s the secret to growing strong, healthy nails?
Fantasy football Week 11: Trade value chart and rest of season rankings
From family road trips to travel woes: Americans are navigating skyrocketing holiday costs
Why Cynthia Erivo Needed Prosthetic Ears for Wicked
Where you retire could affect your tax bill. Here's how.
New wildfires burn in US Northeast while bigger blazes rage out West